‘It’s devastating’: the way 30 captive beluga whales are now tools in row over animal cruelty.
Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie is an charming small “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a large but guardian-like companion. Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and sways like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.
Thirty captive beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have been entangled in a struggle between a defunct facility, government authorities and welfare campaigners.
But those working directly with the whales say the heated debate over their fate often ignores the individual traits of the whales who, after spending their lives in captivity, have been carefully observed by the humans who see them each day.
After the national authorities prevented the export of the belugas to China, the struggling attraction near Niagara Falls where they are kept stated it would consider to put them down unless the government covers the cost of keeping them alive. Canada’s marine resources official has denied that demand, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable situation.
Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals
Experts say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, cognitive challenges and group interactions suggest they are highly cognitive creatures – something Kristy Burgess observed first-hand.
Burgess spent a significant period as a beluga trainer, a job that involved earning the trust of the marine predators.
“Developing those relationships over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so magical and fulfilling.”
The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless surprised by the subtleties and quirks in their dispositions. She developed a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with opposing personalities.
“One whale selected me. The other required effort,” she said. “Each altered the way I view connection.”
Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions
Burgess’s interaction with the whales evolved against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their confinement.
During her tenure at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s single killer whale, the orca, died. In total, 19 belugas have died at the park since 2019, a statistic which the park links to expected lifespan, but which campaigners say reflects the substandard environment in which they were maintained.
The facility did not operate to the guests over the recent season, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand results of the shutdown. “Structural materials is falling apart from the tanks because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are inquisitive and so they take pieces and move about with chunks in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”
The facility did not respond to a request for comment, but previously stated: “The whales … obtain far superior health care and 24/7 attention than any person in the United Kingdom, or elsewhere.”
Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions
The former employee was fired from the park in early March following the passing of a beluga, an unwell beluga the employees had to humanely kill. She said the facility suspected particulars of the incident were shared to the press and she was let go not long after.
The uncertainty over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and other caretakers in despair. She says the facility’s warning to kill its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “practically unfeasible” task, adding any attempts to humanely kill even a individual beluga would require “significant staff”, vehicles and specialized tools.
“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess supports demands for the whales to be removed promptly from the park, with its crumbling tanks and shrinking team.
In recent months, Canada’s fisheries minister turned down a bid to send the whales to an overseas location.
“To approve the proposal would have meant a ongoing existence in enclosure and a reversion to display for amusement,” the minister commented. “As Canadians, we know that marine mammals are meant for the sea, not in pools for our amusement. I could not in good conscience authorize an export that would continue the situation these belugas have experienced.”
But Burgess said the minister’s statements indicate a broader incorrect perception of the facts of existence for belugas raised in confinement.
“The public needs to understand these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need constant supervision for the rest of their years,” she said. “People just don’t realize that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘close it down’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate
As officials attempt to find a solution, proposals have surfaced, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be freed into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a key source of nourishment for Inuit communities.
A proposed refuge in the region of Nova Scotia, which recently received government approval, has proven most controversial. The planned site, which includes extensive space of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a long term solution for eight of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s consulted, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “simply an trial” in the whales’ future.
Some experts say the prospect of a refuge represents a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a feasible solution in the near future.
An official, leader of the plan, said the location will simulate the cognitive activities and diet the whales obtain from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger environment. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|